2 Weeks Well Architected Framework (WAF) Assessment Services

Embee Software Pvt. Ltd.

Embee's Well-Architected Assessment offers tailored, actionable recommendations for optimizing Azure resources, aligning with the principles of the Azure Well-Architected Framework (WAF)

The Azure Well-Architected Framework is a comprehensive set of best practices and guiding principles designed to help organizations build and maintain high-quality solutions on the Azure platform. It aims to address the complexities and challenges associated with deploying business-critical applications in Azure. Azure Well-Architected Framework provides a structured approach to optimize workloads across various dimensions. It is organized around five key pillars:

  1. Cost Optimization
  2. Operational Excellence
  3. Performance Efficiency
  4. Reliability
  5. Security These pillars serve as a foundation for evaluating and improving Azure architectures, ensuring they align with both technical requirements and business goals. Embee’s WAF Assessment Our WAF Assessment encompasses a thorough evaluation of the Azure design to verify that the Azure Landing Zone adheres to WAF guidelines. This consultation will include the review and integration of the well-architected framework for workloads, promoting the effective, secure, and resilient functioning of Azure resources. Approach a) Defining the goals  Identify the goals and objectives of the assessment  Determine the specific areas of focus such as security, network, governance, and cost.

b) Gather Information  Collect relevant information about the Azure cloud infrastructure.  Understand the existing architecture, configurations, and policies.  Review documentation, network diagrams, security controls, and cost data

c) Assessment of Security  Identify potential security risks and vulnerabilities.  Assess the effectiveness of existing security controls and measures.  Review authentication, authorization, encryption, and data protection mechanisms.  Evaluate compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements.  Identify any security gaps and areas for improvement.

d) Assessment of Network  Review the network architecture and connectivity setup.  Evaluate the network design for scalability, availability, and performance.  Identify any bottlenecks, single points of failure and misconfigurations.  Review network security controls, such as firewalls, network access control, and traffic monitoring.  Assess network segmentation and isolation to ensure appropriate access controls e) Assessment of Governance  Review the governance framework and policies.  Assess identity and access management (IAM) controls.  Evaluate resource and subscription management practices.  Assess logging, monitoring, and auditing capabilities.  Review backup and disaster recovery plans.  Identify any governance gaps and areas for improvement.

f) Analysis of Costs  Review the current cost structure and expenditure.  Identify cost optimization opportunities.  Analyse resource utilization and identify any underutilized or idle resources.  Assess the effectiveness of existing cost management practices.  Recommend strategies to optimize costs, such as rightsizing resources, leveraging reserved instances, or implementing cost allocation tags. Deliverables  Current Architecture Diagram  Infrastructure Assessment report.  Security Assessment Report.  Holistic recommendations report  BC-DR recommendations report  The Landing zone design proposed would be architecture

https://store-images.s-microsoft.com/image/apps.20828.b222406f-220d-4ec6-9737-064913bea681.73bbb623-2ab2-4a21-aa7c-62080222d920.d5cbb2c2-a9e6-4cac-9c3d-50ce33b8ee97
https://store-images.s-microsoft.com/image/apps.20828.b222406f-220d-4ec6-9737-064913bea681.73bbb623-2ab2-4a21-aa7c-62080222d920.d5cbb2c2-a9e6-4cac-9c3d-50ce33b8ee97